Every year at the end of the year I try to pull together a mix that celebrates the music tracks that I revisited throughout the year. Without time to do a proper mix this December and with February breathing down my neck as I type, I resorted to a Spotify playlist — just to keep some semblance of my aim.
Question: In what sense was it said in an earlier lecture that the earth is alive?
Answer: It is not only we who are alive. If a part is alive, then the whole is alive. The whole universe is like a chain, and the earth is one link in this chain. Where there is movement, there is life.
If we now look at the relation of the earth to the universe, we shall see that on the one hand the earth’s satellite is included in the sphere of its influence, while on the other the earth enters as a component part into the planetary world of our solar system.
The earth is one of the small planets turning around the sun. The mass of the earth forms an almost negligible fraction compared with the whole mass of planets of the solar system, and the planets exert a very great influence on the life of the earth and on all existing and living organisms — a far greater influence than our science imagines.
The life of individual men, of collective groups, of humanity, depends upon planetary influences in very many things.
The planets also live, as we live upon the earth.
But the planetary world in its turn enters into the solar system and enters as a very unimportant part because the mass of all the planets put together is many times less than the mass of the sun.
The world of the sun is also a world in which we live.
The sun in turn enters into the world of stars, in the enormous accumulation of suns forming the Milky Way.
The starry world is also a world in which we live. Taken as a whole, even according to the definition of modern astronomers, the starry world seems to represent a separate entity having a definite form, surrounded by space beyond the limits of which scientific investigation cannot penetrate.
But astronomy supposes that at immeasurable distances from our starry world other accumulations may exist. If we accept this supposition, we shall say that our starry world enters as a component part into the total quantity of these worlds.
This accumulation of worlds of the “All Worlds” is also a world in which we live.
Science cannot look further, but philosophical thought will see the ultimate principle lying beyond all the worlds, that is, the Absolute, known in Hindu terminology as Brahman.
From Views for the Real World: Early Talks of Gurdjieff In this book Mr. Gurdjieff discusses the obstacles and deceptions faced by anyone in search of inner truth and spiritual guidance.
“This limitless cosmos is full of Presences, full of Persons — full of angels.
We have to discard all our trivialized and anthropocentric conceptions of the nature of such beings. They are personified metaphysical presences, the movers of the worlds, and they provide the connection between ourselves and divinity.
There is no question of anthropomorphism. The personality of these beings is not derived from ours; ours is only a dim reflection of theirs.
The hermeneutic ability of the creative Imagination to transmute all things into symbols destroys the distinction between psychology and cosmology and unites them in a psycho-cosmology in which Creator and creature participate not as opposing terms with an unbridgeable gulf separating them, but as complementary poles of a divine drama.”
–Tom Cheetham from The World Turned Inside Out
The divine drama, it’s worth all of the effort — heart and soul — we commit to translating its dance. I’ll help you connect the dots! Join me on the following social media — whichever suits your particular style, temperament and art.
Illustration by Ilonka Karasz from William Maxwell’s The Heavenly Tenants (Harpers) 1946
Man is a plural being.
When we speak of ourselves ordinarily, we speak of ‘I.’ We say, ” ‘I’ did this,” ” ‘I’ think this,” ” ‘I’ want to do this”—but this is a mistake. There is no such ‘I,’ or rather there are hundreds, thousands of little ‘I’s in every one of us. We are divided in ourselves but we cannot recognize the plurality of our being except by observation and study.
At one moment it is one ‘I’ that acts, at the next moment it is another ‘I.’ It is because the ‘I’s in ourselves are contradictory that we do not function harmoniously. We live ordinarily with only a very minute part of our functions and our strength, because we do not recognize that we are machines, and we do not know the nature and working of our mechanism.
We are machines. We are governed entirely by external circumstances. All our actions follow the line of least resistance to the pressure of outside circumstances.
Try for yourselves: can you govern your emotions? No. Read more
What’s a revelator? A ‘revelator’ is one who reveals, especially one who reveals divine will.
Divine will is different from your will. (Not really, but for the sake of this post I’ll say that there’s a difference.)
A more poetic way to put this comes from Chin-Ning Chu who declared:
“Two agendas are prevalent in your life: Heaven’s and yours.”
If you study the animated GIF above, and watch for the little crown, that ‘exchange’ will give you a better understanding, than the conventional, of Chu’s wisdom.
The start of a new year provokes most of us to look straight into the face of Time — usually towards the last few days of December (which is why so many people get so drunk on New Year’s Eve), and wonder: “What the fuck happened?” As in, where did the Time ‘go’.
This is understandable because for most of the year, like most of our lives, we avoid developing a sound relationship with Time and instead feel that Time is stalking us, cornering us, going too fast or in some instances, like a terrible job, going too slow. It’s anything but lovely. We are distanced from Time’s magic creative ability.
The Buddhist teacher Tarthang Tulku writes about our relationship to time like this:
“Existence itself depends on time and necessarily partakes of the derivative past-present-future structure and also of transitoriness.”
This is another way that Time is a revelator. If there wasn’t time we wouldn’t see the things that exist in space. We would have no way to exerpience experiences because everything, both internal and external, would just be an amorphic blob.
Astrologers are familiar with this truth in the way they associate the planet Saturn with Time. Saturn, as a function of the divine, draws boundaries, imparts a sense of solidarity, despite the fact that, as Neptune reminds us, things aren’t really ‘there’ in the solid way that we think they are. But no matter, you have to know where the bus stop is to make your 3 o’clock doctor’s appointment. This is living by Saturn’s laws, not Neptune’s.
“‘Things’ are here, in the present only to pass out of reach. ‘Things’ are desired (due perhaps to previous such losses to the past) but are ‘not yet’. We have become so conditioned by this trend that all our hopes and aspirations amount to filling up little slots in a sort of personalized past-present-future grid. We are literally timing ourselves away.”
He goes on to explain how, should we not develop a solid relationship to Time, that when we reach the end of our life we will be confronted with the accumulative fallout of our ignorance. Time then presents us with the seeming finality of death.
“Death,” he says, “is a totally opaque partition. We cannot see beyond it, nor can we see it clearly enough to discover other options around it.” Read more